Why Atheists Align with Democrats

By: Adam Brown (Founder of AtheismResource.com)

Yes, this is a long article… but it has good research and is worth your time to read. Sorry, no TLDR – just read it!

The United States of America is hardly united. On virtually every political issue, America will cover the entire sliding scale of opinion from extreme conservative, evangelical Christian right to the extreme liberal, progressive, socialist left. We also have a large chunk of the population that just does not care. These people do not pay attention to the issues, regardless if it directly affects their lives, especially in their local or national elections. In fact, if someone in a conversation doesn’t mention these political issues with him or her, they probably wouldn’t know anything about it. For the purposes of this article, we don’t discuss these people. I will look at the political views of active atheists and non-religious people in America and show that there is a preponderance to be towards the left (Democratic) side of the political spectrum and why this alignment occurs. It will also become clear that the more religiously motivated a political position, the more united and fervent the atheists in America are in opposition to it.

First of all, this alignment won’t occur for all issues or for all atheists. When I say “most”, we will assume that means more then 50% of the non-religious. Some issues will be more polarizing than others and some will be more uniting and homogenous in its secular support. Atheists go by many names and some despise labels entirely. For the purpose of cohesion, I will use the terms atheist and non-religious interchangeably, although many non-religious would not call themselves atheists. The Non-religious does not attend any churches and many do not believe in any definable god. They just don’t like the term “Atheist” which simply means someone holds “a disbelief in the existence of a deity” (Merriam-Webster Inc., 2012).

America isn’t the most secular nation on earth, not by far. But, it’s getting closer every year In March of 2012, Gallup released another poll on the religiosity of Americans as a whole and by individual state. They reported that 32% of Americans identify as non-religious. They were determined to be non-religious “based on their statement that religion is not an important part of their daily life and that they seldom or never attend religious services.” (Newport, Gallup Poll, March 2012)

According to Pew Forum on Religion and Political Life, their study of 35,000 Americans over the age of 18, shows “that the number of people who say they are unaffiliated with any particular faith today (16.1%) is more than double the number who say they were not affiliated with any particular religion as children. Among Americans ages 18-29, one-in-four say they are not currently affiliated with any particular religion.” (PEW, 2007)

This number is a significant portion of the population, roughly 50 million American adults. That’s equivalent to the member size of the AARP (Association of Adult Retired Persons). If this group was an organized lobbying force, they could be the single largest lobby in Washington D.C.

“Like the other major groups, people who are unaffiliated with any particular religion (16.1%) also exhibit remarkable internal diversity. Although one-quarter of this group consists of those who describe themselves as atheist or agnostic (1.6% and 2.4% of the adult population overall, respectively), the majority of the unaffiliated population (12.1% of the adult population overall) is made up of people who simply describe their religion as “nothing in particular.” (PEW, 2007)

One of the most interesting voting blocks is the 18 – 29 age group. These college-aged adults are voting in record numbers (as the 2008 election showed us) and are forming atheist groups on campuses across the country like never before.

The Secular Student Alliance, the official college atheist organization for the United States has over 300 college groups around the country (and over 100 high school groups) (secularstudents.org). This rise, as noted in the chart above, is dramatic over the last 5 years. This young voting block is showing they care and becoming more politically active. As they leave religion, organized church groups are finding they are losing ground. According to ARIS (American Religious Identification Survey), “so many Americans claim no religion at all (15%, up from 8% in 1990), that this category now outranks every other major U.S. religious group except Catholics and Baptists. In a nation that has long been mostly Christian, “the challenge to Christianity … does not come from other religions but from a rejection of all forms of organized religion,” the report concludes (Grossman, USA Today, 2009).

Atheists tend to be more Democratic than Republican. Part of this are the issues the two parties represent, as I’ll discuss at length later, and the fact that Republicans have a more favorable view of religions than Democrats. In other words, as the chart above shows, atheists are more welcome in the Democratic Party (Newport, Gallup Poll, 2006). Atheist may only have one thing in common, by definition (lack of belief in any gods) but we do find that Atheists group politically more homogenously than many other identifying labels. And, they mean business. The lobbying arm of the atheist movement is the Secular Coalition of America (SCA). They represent all non-religious Americans and fight for real and permanent separation of church and state. SCA recently hired prominent Republican lobbyist and strategist Edwina Rogers as the Executive Director for the organization. “The decision to select a Republican, specifically considering the stereotypes that lead individuals to assume that most atheist leaders are progressive in nature, is noteworthy.” (Hallowell, The Blaze, 2012). The SCA is trying to reach the Republicans in congress who have in the past ignored secular lobbying efforts. This new political insider was a direct and obvious attempt to change that. They often get attention and audience with Democratic leaders, but rarely with the political right. This change will allow Republicans to finally consider the issues that are important to Secular Americans. The issues the SCA lobby’s for are as follows:

  • End Religious Discrimination in the Military
  • Protect Foreign Women from U.S. Religious Extremist Policies in Foreign Aid
  • Eliminate Religiously-Based Laws Interfering with Contraception Access
  • Eliminate Health and Safety Standard Exemptions for Religious Child Care Centers
  • Protect Teen Students’ Rights to Form Atheist Clubs
  • End Marriage Discrimination and Oppose Theological Definitions of Marriage
  • Revoke Public Funding to the Boy Scouts Due to Religiously-Based Discrimination
  • Eliminate Religious Control of Sex Education in Public Schools
  • Remove “Under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance
  • End Public Funding of Religious Schools
  • Eliminate Taxpayer-Funded Housing for ‘Ministers of the Gospel’
  • Do not allow tax money to be used to mislead children for religious reasons
  • End Employment Discrimination by Religious Groups via ‘Faith-Based’ Initiatives

(Secular Coalition for America, Our Issues, 2011)
It’s a lot to cover. Too much for this article, so I’ll limit my scope to what most atheist Democrats consider the big issues: Women’s Rights, Gay Rights, and Science. These topics have become so important to atheist in the past few years that, in 2011, the National Atheist Party (NAP) formed. NAP president, Troy Boyle explains the groups goals.

“Atheism and politics may seem at first glance to be uneasy partners at best. Nothing could be further from the truth. Atheism is a world-view that encompasses politics, because it is a world-view centered on evidence-based conclusions and the use of reason and rationality to solve problems. Throughout the history of this great nation, time and time again, reason and rationality have been abandoned for problem solving methods based on irrationality, fear and religio-centrism. The current popular rise of the “religious right” is a manifestation of this wholesale abandonment of hundreds of years of progress and scientific thought. Atheism embraces science, progress, and social ethics and this is reflected in the platform of the National Atheist Party.” (Boyle, National Atheist Party, 2011)

As we will see from their own internal polls, the more the religious right  back a political stance, the more the National Atheist Party opposes it, “Our party is founded to oppose the religion-based and biased public policies of those who would like to see the U.S. government change from the secular government envisioned and enacted by the framers of the Constitution into a theocracy no different from the prevailing governments of the Middle East.” (Boyle, National Atheist Party, 2011) As evidence for this, we can look at three issues put before their members just a few months ago. The party polled their members on “In God We Trust” on our currency, The Fairness Doctrine, and Alternative Power (National Atheist Party Board Elections and Referendums 2012).

The results are as follows:

- Repeal “IN God We Trust” as the national motto and from use on currency and official documents?

This is an issue with major criticism from the evangelical Christian right. They spend lots of money and attention t on this issue, when it comes up in court (as well as the National Day of Prayer), so we fight against it. Atheists are 96% in agreement that this issue should be brought up and challenged in federal court.

QUESTION #2 - Make reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine a part of the National Atheist Party platform?

This issue has less religious nature to it. While Christians have pushed to allow their channels and news stations to not be held to this doctrine, it is less important to them, and therefore less important to atheists. This topic received 89% agreement from atheists. However, on the last topic of alternative energy…

QUESTION #3 Should the NAP immediately ban the licensure for construction of new electric power plants powered by fossil fuels — coal, oil, or natural gas? Power companies must turn to nuclear power or alternative energy source.


Alternative energy is a big topic with a variety of opinions, but only 68% of atheists in this poll could agree that fossil fuels were a bad thing. However, this still goes to prove the point. These numbers are in line (but still higher) than Democrats as a whole and in stark contrast to Republicans, as the chart to the right shows. Religious people tend to feel they have ownership of the earth (as the bible states). “The earth is the Lord’s, and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it.” (Psalm 24:1) This leads believers to do with it as they please.

Even if they do think that they are hurting the earth, 41% of them don’t see that as a problem because they believe that Jesus will return in their lifetime and take them to heaven… leaving the earth abandoned and no longer in need of stewardship (see chart). It should be starting to become apparent that issues that that are important to religious people are equally and proportionally important to non-religious people. The less religious a topic, the less atheists oppose it and the more divided they are in their opinion of it. The more religious a topic, the more atheists oppose it and the more homogenous their opinion of it. This becomes extremely clear with the following issues of women’s rights, gay rights, and science.

When I say “Women’s Rights”, I refer to reproductive rights. These involve votes to limit access to contraception and abortions for women in all 50 states. On March 29th, 2012, the American Secular Census released the results of their study on how atheists thought politically. They found that 97% of secular voters surveyed favor abortion rights (Secular Census, 2012). So, since there have been over 351 anti-abortion bills introduced since 2011 when Republicans took control of America’s House of Representative and many state congresses around the country (Steinmetz, Time, 2011) it’s no wonder that atheists line up on the other side of the aisle. They see no secular reason to oppose abortion and the Christian right hasn’t given them any. With only religious answers to questions of “why not”, atheists find it virtually impossible to support anti-abortion legislation.

As for gay rights and marriage equality, 96% support the Democratic policy of full equality (Secular Census, 2012). This is an easy one to support since, yet again, there is no secular justification to not let two people of the same sex marry or adopt. The only reasons given are religious ones straight from Christian morality and bible-based teachings.

Science is a big topic of interest for atheists that include things like teaching creationism in science classrooms, stopping life-saving stem cell research, and defunding science initiatives like N.A.S.A.

“Within both the secular and the scientific communities there is no controversy about the legitimacy of evolutionary theory in explaining the diversity of life. Secular Census respondents oppose the teaching of creationism and intelligent design in public school science classes, but a non-trivial minority feel there is a place for these discussions as myth or literature.” (Secular Census 2012). According to the National Atheist Party, “argue that paying equal time to notions such as creationism corrodes understanding of the scientific process. This puts the US at a s scientific disadvantage internationally not to mention makes us a laughing stock around the globe.” (National Atheist Party, 2011)

Stem cell research has been slowed down due to its close ties to the anti-abortion lobby. This bothers atheists since it is often due to the lack of understanding of stem cell research that causes the right to oppose it. Stem cells have been shown to have amazing promise in treating and/or curing many of the diseases that afflict millions around the world. Atheists see stopping this for religious reasons to be unconstitutional and an abusive misuse of power. Democrats support stem cell research (see chart), so atheists support Democrats. (PEW, 2005)

If you review the topics discussed in this article and how atheist vote on the issue, you will see they are aligned with Democratic policies and politicians. This is why most atheists are Democrats. They are more accepted, have their opinions more obviously expressed by their elected officials, and face less bigotry by other members of the Democratic Party, even the religious ones. Yes, there are atheist Republicans. In most cases, they are going to be financially conservative but more liberal on social issues. Notice, the topics discussed here are largely social and not economic. On matters of economy, there are few aspects that are religious (other than church exemptions and tax breaks) so atheists aren’t united on one side of the issue. They don’t need to be. On those issues, god is rarely used one way or the other… except in issues of welfare – somehow the GOP doesn’t think Jesus would want the rich to help pay for the poor. Explaining that would take an entire other article!

As the research showed, atheism is the fastest growing “religious” section of society. As church pews empty, meet-up groups, secular student organizations, and atheist political activism agencies are growing in numbers. These 50,000,000+ Americans will demand that their voices be heard. Their issues will be hot-button topics in upcoming elections. The framers of the constitution wanted to ensure that all people, those of faith in deities and those without, were able to live together, freely in a country of mutual interests. They were the first secular leaders. Since the 1950’s when “In God We Trust” and “Under God” was added to our currency and our pledge of allegiance, Evangelical Christians have exerted their force through votes and money to make America a “Christian nation”. This flies in the face of all that makes America great. People see that now. Our populace craves the melting pot we all heard about as children. We desire a country filled with cultural, religious, and political diversity. Atheists don’t want to destroy religion. Far from it. They just want religious people to play fair. And, since they’ve been allowed for over 60 years now to bypass the separation of church and state, skirt issues of religious freedom, and push their agenda into congress, they feel oppressed when they are now being told to stop.

It’s inevitable. You can’t deny the math. Atheism is growing rapidly. Atheists align with Democratic policies and issues. As the voting block grows, there simply won’t be the political support for right-wing religious issues anymore. No matter how hard they try, Republicans won’t be able to ignore atheists. They can either fear them and lose or embrace them and change. A secular America is a real and visible future. If the Grand Old Party wants to survive, and continue to be part of the political landscape, they will have see this too, or they will be relegated to history books just like the 5,000+ gods atheists don’t believe in.

Boyle, Troy. (2011). Atheism & Politics. National Atheist Party. Retrieved on April
24, 2012 from http://www.usanap.org/documents/co-founders-statement-troy-boyle.html/

Graham, Jesse, Nosek, Brian and Haidt, Jonathan, The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals
and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences Across the Political Divide Social Science Research Network. (January 1, 2011) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2027266.

Grossman, Cathy Lynn. (March 2009). Most Religious Groups in USA Have Lost
Ground, Survey Finds. USA Today. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2009-03-09-american-religion-ARIS_N.htm

Hall, Deborah L., Matz, David C., Wood, Wendy. Why Don’t We Practice What We
Preach? A Meta-Analytic Review of Religious Racism. Personality and Social
Psychology Review. February 2010. 14:126-139

Hallowell, Billy, (May 2012). Surprise! Atheist Lobbying Group Hires Prominent
Republican Strategist to Serve as Executive Director. The Blaze. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://www.theblaze.com/stories/surprise-atheist-lobbying-group-hires-prominent-republican-strategist-to-serve-as-executive-director/

Insurance Directory (2012). AARP. Retrieved on April, 24, 2012 from

Jetta, Jolanda, Haslan, Alexander S., Barlow, Fiona Kate. Bringing Back the System:
One Reason Why Conservatives are Happier Than Liberals is That Higher Socioeconimic Status Gives them Access to More Group Memberships. Social Psychological and Personality Science. March 2012. doi:10.1177/1948550612439721

Merriam-Webster, Inc. (2011). Define: Atheism. Retrieved on April, 24, 2012 from

National Atheist Party. March Newsletter. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from

National Atheist Party. (March 2012). National Atheist Party Board Elections and
Referendums 2012. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from https://www.electionbuddy.com/elections/3263/results/aqq8v8k65

Newport, Frank. (September 2007). Democrats View Religious Groups Less
Positively Than Republicans. Gallup, Inc. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/24385/democrats-view-religious-groups-less-positively-than-republicans.aspx

Newport, Frank. (March 2012). Mississippi Is Most Religious U.S. State. Gallop, Inc.
Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/153479/Mississippi-Religious-State.aspx

PEW Research Center. (May 2005). More See Benefits of Stem Cell Research:
Opinions Divide Along Religious Lines. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://www.people-press.org/2005/05/23/more-see-benefits-of-stem-cell-research/

Render, Meredith, Religious Practice and Sex Discrimination: An Uneasy Case for
Toleration (March 9, 2012). MATTERS OF FAITH, Austin Sarat, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012; U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 2019166. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2019166

Secular Census. (March 2012). Our First ever viewpoint analysis of the American
Secular Census. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://www.secularcensus.us/analysis/2012-03-30

Secular Coalition For America. (2011). Our Issues. Retrieved on April, 24, 2012
from http://secular.org/issues

Steinmetz, Katy. (March 2011). What’s Behind the Surge of Abortion Bills? Time
Magazine. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://swampland.time.com/2011/03/24/whats-behind-the-surge-of-abortion-bills/

The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (Mar-Aug 2007). U.S. Religious
Affiliation. Retrieved on April 24, 2012 from http://religions.pewforum.org/reports

  • http://www.facebook.com/sydvicious Syd Polk

    Excellent article, but I have to point out that “In God We Trust” was added to coins long before 1950. It first appeared in 1864 on the two-cent piece. For pieces that are in circulation today, it first appeared on pennies in 1908 with the introduction of the Lincoln cent; Nickel, 1866; Dime, 1946; Quarter, 1866; Half-Dollar, 1866; Dollar coin, 1866. My reference is the 2013 edition of the A Guide Book of United States Coins, Yeoman/Bresset, et al

  • Jdatty

    Many atheists are conservatives…or worse.

    Case in point…Ayn Rand.

    • AbsolutelyLedge

      She was a Libertarian, son.

  • Blake

    TL, DR

  • Brian

    moral of the story, Democrats are Atheists

  • http://www.facebook.com/jason.bawden.14 Jason Bawden

    Then i guess i am on of the few atheists who is not apart of the democratic and isn’t even a liberal as well.

  • Jeremiah Who

    All democrats are
    clearly atheists. It would be impossible for anyone to believe that The
    God of Creation spoken of in The Bible exists while embracing homosexual
    marriage, abortion, and the countless other values supported by this alleged
    political group. The democrats are in fact, a well organized religion
    disguised as a political party. The democrats are the “gods” of
    the atheists. I have read numerous posts from countless atheists calling
    Bill Clinton and/or Barack Obama their “god”. Regardless of whether they post these
    statements for shock value or simply to insult Christian readers, these facts
    cannot be denied. The democratic party seeks power, and atheists have
    exalted them to the position of “god” knowing that without the
    democrats atheists would have no hope of removing Jesus Christ from American
    culture. Atheism is simply a
    religion seeking any god to worship other than Jesus Christ, and
    the democratic party fulfills this need by denying Jesus as God and permitting
    the atheists to bow before them. The
    trend that I continuously witness as I have personally assisted hundreds of atheists
    in their conversion to Christianity is that they immediately change their
    political party affiliation from democrat to republican. The truth is not that they support the
    republican party’s values, but rather, they want to distance themselves as much
    as possible from the democrats after being born again.

    • Deputy

      Wow. You just made a giant false and inaccurate generalization. SOME democrats are atheist and SOME democrats are Christians. And there are SOME republicans who are atheist. You’re comment is pure sickening. Just sickening!

    • Wolfeye

      You, my friend, have been watching FAR too much Fox News. Wanna know why a christian democrat might be in favor of gay marriage? 1. Gays may not adhere to the christian religion, and therefore, on the assumption that christianity may be incorrect regardless of ones viewpoints, it would be morally right to allow them to believe what they wish and act how they wish because God is the judge, not us.
      2. Doesn’t actually contradict the Bible. The Bible calls it sin to act on homosexuality in the means of committing said sexual act, but to men being with each other is not against the Bible

      3. The Bible was written by MEN inspired by God and thus cannot be considered absolute. If god created gays, then God must love them regardless due to his innate love for all his creations.

      Those are just three reasons. I could list several more. Want me to go on? Alright.

      4. Religion is too broad and too many possibilities, just because one person or maybe a group of people believe in a particular thing does not make it true. the classic “invisible unicorn” case can be made here, but thats off topic. Point is: Just because you believe gays are evil, does not make it true. Thus we should treat all people fairly regardless.

      5. Christianity was also responsible for the Crusades, witch burning, women murders, mass murders, the stoning to death of many different people for the mere fact that they were, in fact, different, and the justification of slavery. Their track record of being correct when discriminating is terrible. Thus, blind acceptance of the idea that your God wishes gays to be hated is an unacceptable level of stupid.

      6. No matter the color, sexuality, gender, or any other factor of a human, it is still that: Human. And no person should be treated as less than that.

      7.Gay marriage holds NO affect on Christians. Just because two gay men get married does not mean you will be going to hell.

      I really, really could go on, but I’m sure there is a character limit in place. Moving on to abortion, which is a simple answer: A woman who has been raped should not have to bear said child. But women who have not been raped and did this on purpose? That’s there fault. However, how do you know if a woman is raped? You’ll have to go through the legal system, which can take months or even years on a trial like that. And thats assuming they can even find the father. By that time, the child will already have been born. Thus, it is not an option to wait. Therefore, in order to assure rape and incest victims can have abortions, it must be legal across the board, because there is no way to regulate a lie.

      So I’ll just end it with this: The only real point you made that is factual is the gay marriage standpoint, which I obviously just proved CAN be accepted by christians. And abortion can too, but that was a rather obvious reasoned standpoint. The rest of your argument is mindless gibberish claiming atheists view democrats as god which is, by all means, false and nonsense that you’re using to create a strawman to support your own crazed beliefs in a conspiracy against god and to further proof to yourself that god exists by stating all people know he does but refuse him, which is simply not true.

  • Pingback: Conservative Bikers Protect Newtown Mourners from Left-Wing Westboro Cult - Page 34

  • Tay

    I do not believe in religion, but I’m not a democrat. I’m a capitalist and democrats are promoting socialism. I’m against welfare. I’m pro-gun, pro-choice, and I’m OK with gay marriage.

  • David Fisher

    As a Skeptical Libertarian I ride the fence on these issues. I would be your typical fiscally conservative but socially liberal atheist spoken of in the article. The reason I don’t classify myself as liberal is because I believe in personal responsibility. My issue with the rich “helping” the poor is that the government is confiscating that money at the point of a gun while those receiving the money are voting for those holding the gun. Therefore I think “Jesus” (or insert your deity here) would call it an apples and oranges argument. Charity is not charity if it’s not freely given. Being a Libertarian is the best of both worlds. You are free to do as you please as long as you don’t infringe on the right of others.

  • Pingback: Religion and Duck Dynasty - Page 2

  • https://twitter.com/JK11165 John Kissel

    Mohamed Elibiary‏@MohamedElibiary
    @1776son America and yes I do consider the United States of America an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution. Move On!

    Muslim appointed by Obama supporter of Muslim brotherhood
    Nuff said

  • Pingback: Gay Group Demands Christian Churches Be shut down for Opposing Same-Sex Marriage - Page 2

  • Panda Jay

    Nice article. I’m going to reply with one of my own in hopes to shine the light on the root cause of the problem, rather than talk about the symptoms in attempt to steer others to my ideology. This one will also not have a TL;DR tag, so sit back, sip some coffee, and enjoy the mind of a free thinker.

    It feels a little like a spiritual roll-call here in the comments, so I’ll join in by introducing myself by faith first. I’m a Deist. It’s a form of spiritual belief where one acknowledges a creator of the universe, but one does not worship them nor attempts to identify them as relative to humanity. It’s just there, or was. We’re also called Agnostics, even though there are some minor differences between the belief structures. Anyway, this Creator is non-interventionalist – no amount of prayer, begging, pleading, crying, threatening, or whining is going to provoke a reaction or bring about a salvation. We can be appreciative of the wonder and majesty of the Creation, but it was not created for the purpose of worship nor slaying one another over the practice thereof. To a Deist all things have a beginning and an end, and science helps us to discover those points, and if the system is self-replicating in nature. Life is self-replicating, for example, which lends to the theory that the Universe itself may be a living thing. It leaves open the possibility that it indeed created itself somehow without putting a definitive Yes / No on anything. To this end, the Creator is not necessarily a being, a god – it could be something as simple as a ball of explosive supermatter, or it could be hyperstrings, the quantum foam, or something so simple as a light switch that someone in a so-called “higher plane” flipped as they came into their office. It is a thing that we do not understand and until we do understand, it defies classification. For all we know it could literally be a giant question mark hanging out in space somewhere, or even a very tiny one at the bottom of the micro-nano-scope.
    Therefore, my Deism allows me to be a Rationalist who acknowledges that there is a higher power than myself in the Universe, and it may or may not have contributed to our evolution. It really doesn’t matter either way because we’re in charge of ourselves. If we weren’t something would have showed up by now to let us know.

    So, now that my credentials are in good order and on the table, let’s talk about Democrats and Republicans and their skeletons in the closet. We’ll talk in extreme generalizations because no one has time for details anymore. Democrats are a cancer on free society these days. They were back in the day as well, but now the cancer pretends to be benign rather than just being overtly malignant. Republicans are no better anymore. It is a debate over control between Authoritarians on the Left and Theocratic Advocates on the Right, not a debate between freedom and rights for everybody. This is the major flaw in political thinking that keeps us divided. Both sides are propped up by supporters who honestly believe that their side is fighting for human rights and the other side wants to take those rights away. Everyone deserves human rights. Everyone deserves freedoms and liberties. No one is disagreeing with that, even those who want to control the rest of us and dictate who can do what, when, and how. Not everyone is required to be the arbitrator of those freedoms and liberties, and that’s the part that people Left and Right stumble on.
    The Gay Cake Incident is the best example of the modern day: If a cake shop owner does not want to bake a cake for a particular client or set of clients for whatever reason, then that’s their choice. The beauty of Capitalism is that for every cake owner who refuses, there is another cake owner who will offer the same service for half price. Democrats do not support this – they believe an Authoritarian Government can force cake shop owners to do everything from bake cakes for free for people they don’t like, to also drill for copper if someone wants to build an electrical outlet. Complete government authority is very bad because it forces something on some that they do not want while opening the door for truly ludicrous demands to be made. Democrats believe all gays should get weddings and cakes and everyone should be forced to give it to them no matter what.

    But does that make Republicans good? Only if you’re an absolutist who believes the political spectrum is an alignment line rather than a horseshoe. Republicans believe the other direction – not only can gay people not get married by non-Christian methods, but by no means at all because the Fundamentalist Bible said so. Therefore there is no cake or marriage for gays even if those gays are not Christian and don’t want a Christian wedding. Not even if someone volunteers to do it are they allowed it. That’s Totalitarianism. According to the Fundamentalist Right, we have Free Will, but only on the things the Bible allows because their God apparently banished humanity and turned his holy back on us… but then changed his mind and started dictating to us again how we’re to live. Even sent himself / his son / some guy to remind us that he needs worship from these beings he outright rejected because they ate his fruit, got mad when that avatar died after trying to overthrow Rome, and then chilled and let that avatar be the window through which humanity can speak to the Christian God whom now doesn’t seem to need that window after all. Even though he still never bothers to answer anybody when they do try to talk to him. Neither does the window. And this is what we’re supposed to base our decisions from? Totalitarian Theocracy, where all our mandates come from people who are guessing about the meaning of a 14 times translated book, and are real good at making other people feel threatened about the mystery of death. That’s a cancer in and of itself, but we can talk about that more later. Needless to say that’s why a lot of Atheists are repelled by them. They don’t want to be dictated to from a book by a hypocrite. Most atheists tend to be good people who believe good is defined by action rather than word, and bad people can say all the good words they want. I’ve demonstrated that now on how both Parties do it.

    The correct way to think, then, is to reject both Parties and their Socialist / Theocratic dogma. If someone wants to be religious, that is their freedom as much as it is mine to not be religious. If I own a business, it is my decision to serve or refuse anyone at my own expense of revenue and reputation. Neither Democrats nor Republicans have the freedom to punish myself or my business, nor reward me for the same reasons. The sole exception is if my business practices harm the life of someone (i.e. a hospital refusing treatment to an injured person, a bar allowing a customer to drink themselves to the point of passing out), then I am indeed to be punished and my business shut down for unethical behavior. Government business regulations are meant to protect the safety of the clients and servers of businesses, not to control them to the point where they can or cannot operate solely on what the alphabet soup of agencies decide is acceptable this week based on political correctness and popular opinion.

    So what it all boils down to is this: if I run a wedding outlet that caters to all people regardless of faith, then I am an alternative to a church which caters only to those who meet the qualifications they set. That is the beauty of Capitalism and the Free Market, and the very nature of a free society. These are the things that Democrats are so hateful of. Instead of allowing people to provide alternatives, they want to destroy the freedom of people to have choices at all. You will either do, or you will do not. There is no room for silly things like human rights and liberty as long as someone wants to be lazy and not shop around. When you force others to do something, you strip them of their human rights. When you do not allow them to believe what they want to believe without first forcing your beliefs on them, you strip them of their human rights. Therefore Republicans also hate freedom and liberty.

    That is why both are cancer. This is a nation founded on freedom of choice, on liberty and self-determination. Their policies are anti-choice and anti-liberty. They are the party of Authoritarian Absolutism. Socialists try to say they’re better than Theocrats, but ultimately are equally as bad. They both say their way is the only right way, so give them your money and your loyalty and they’ll save you from the other guy. What a choice! Do I go with the crazy nutballs who make policy from a book they don’t even follow yet is claimed to be absolute fact and law, or with the insane moonbats who make their policy from a political social theory that is utterly unsustainable, has been tried many times, and failed every single time?

    Perhaps if we evict all of the Democrats and Republicans and start anew with Rationalists who actually believe in Free Republics and Capitalism we can do a world of good for everybody. The Founders of America were Rationalists who believed in a Free Republic and Capitalism, and look how quickly the United States advanced in such a short time. We rose beyond all the other nations in the world that have existed for hundreds to thousands of years because we tried someone no one ever tried before and it worked. At least until the Democrats and Republicans decided to screw it all up with their Socialism and Religion.

    And no, we are not and never were a Christian Nation. The Founders were primarily Deists, Agnostics, and Episcopalians. None of these religious practices included Theocracy, but instead express very explicitly the relationship of Man and God (or God Analogue) as being a deeply personal thing that no one else has business attempting to influence. This is why we have the First Amendment that protects freedom of beliefs. We’re a Non-Secularist Nation and it works better that way for everybody. I deeply enjoy my freedom to believe what I choose and will never support any political party that wants to take that from me. Democrats and Republicans both try daily. If you love the right to your own mind, I urge you to reject them both and band together to uplift some alternatives. We’re a Capitalist Society, so the sentiment that we have only two equally bad options for our government is a sick joke that we did to ourselves. The best we can do in the Land of Opportunity is a Bipartisan System? We’re better than this. We can undo this and have a better country for it. A better world, actually, but one step at a time.

  • Dswynne

    Reason why atheist tend to vote Democratic, is the same reason why anyone would vote Democratic: they don’t believe in a strict interpretation of the US Constitution that includes protection of religious rights. How many atheists supported Hobby Lobby, or the Catholics wanting exemption on birth control? I heard not one peep out of anyone defending religious groups basic rights on those issues, especially the SCA.